Interview: Sumit Kumar

Founder and Director at Headsup B2B Pvt. Ltd.

Headsup B2B's Sumit Kumar Explains Why Procurement is Biggest Challenge for India's C&I Solar

July 07, 2026. By Abha Rustagi

“We’re the backbone, not the developer — we don’t own panels, we make sourcing them reliable,” said Sumit Kumar, Founder and Director, Headsup B2B, in an interview with Abha Rustagi, Associate Editor, Energetica India.

Que: India’s C&I sector is emerging as one of the largest drivers of solar adoption. What are the key factors behind this shift, and how is Headsup witnessing this trend among its customers and partners?

Ans: It stopped being about optics and became pure math. Buyers pay their DISCOM INR 7–12 a unit when open access lands at INR 3.5–5.5 — a 20–40 percent saving — with Scope 2 pressure flowing down from global supply chains. India added a record 7.8 GW of open access solar in 2025, with 45+ GW in the pipeline. On the ground, the question has moved from “should we” to “how fast.” The constraint isn’t intent anymore — it’s execution and supply chain.


Que: Which sectors are currently leading the adoption of solar energy, and where does Headsup see the greatest untapped potential for future solar deployment?

Ans: The leaders are the energy-intensive ones — manufacturing, textiles, warehousing, data centres, even flour mills. But C&I is still only about 30 GW of cumulative solar — a minority of the total. The real headroom sits in MSME clusters and Tier-2/3 manufacturing: they feel the tariff pain most but lack procurement muscle and financing access. The firms already going solar are the ones who could always afford the complexity. The next wave is everyone who couldn’t.


Que: Are companies today evaluating solar investments differently compared to five years ago? From Headsup’s perspective, what key metrics are influencing decision-making?

Ans: Five years ago it was payback period and capex subsidy — a rooftop project. Today it’s landed cost over a 15–20 year horizon, energy security, Scope 2 commitments, and round-the-clock reliability. Group captive structuring for surcharge exemptions is now a board-level call. The sharpest signal we see: serious buyers ask about ALMM compliance and component provenance upfront. They’re underwriting bankability, not just chasing the lowest quote.


Que: As a procurement platform, what inefficiencies does Headsup commonly observe in traditional sourcing processes for solar projects?

Ans: A fragmented vendor base, opaque pricing, no real price discovery. Spec and quality mismatches — and with the ALMM 2026 mandate on domestic cells from June 1, compliance is now a live procurement risk. And the silent killer is payment: when a vendor waits 60–90 days to get paid, they quietly deprioritise your order and the project slips. Most “solar delays” are procurement and working-capital failures wearing a different costume.


Que: How does Headsup B2B help EPC companies, developers, and industrial buyers improve procurement efficiency and risk management?

Ans: We’re the backbone, not the developer — we don’t own panels, we make sourcing them reliable. A verified vendor network with transparent pricing; ALMM and BIS checks caught before they become site problems; and embedded channel finance through Mintifi, so vendors get paid fast and deliver on time. That one mechanism turns a fragile, relationship-dependent supply chain into a predictable one. We take procurement off the buyer’s critical path.


Que: How important will energy storage be in accelerating the next phase of solar adoption, and what role can Headsup play in supporting this transition?

Ans: Storage is the unlock — solar alone is a daytime asset, and industry runs 24×7. The economics have flipped fast: solar-plus-storage now clears at INR 3–3.5/kWh, below new coal at INR 5–6.3, and as states tighten banking, storage is becoming the main tool for 24×7 loads. Our role is the same as always — we don’t own batteries, we make the storage supply chain sourceable, verified and financed. As BESS scales, that procurement complexity is exactly where a platform earns its keep.


Que: What policy interventions could further accelerate solar deployment across businesses and industries, and how can platforms like Headsup contribute to enabling wider adoption?

Ans: The biggest drag isn’t cost or technology — it’s regulatory fragmentation. Banking restrictions, shifting open-access charges and surcharge hikes change the math overnight and erode confidence. What helps: predictable multi-year charge regimes, rationalised banking, faster approvals, and a smoother ALMM transition. But policy creates demand — demand without execution infrastructure just builds pipelines that never get delivered. That’s our contribution: transparent sourcing, compliant vendors, and financing that keeps the supply base healthy enough to deliver.


Please share! Email Buffer Digg Facebook Google LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Twitter
If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content,
please contact: contact@energetica-india.net.
 
 
Next events
 
 
Last interviews
 
Follow us