Interview: Rishi Agrawal

Co-Founder and CEO at TeamLease RegTech

Draft Energy Conservation Rules, 2025: How Energy-Intensive Sectors Can Brace for Change

September 12, 2025. By Dineshwori

Last month, the Ministry of Power released the draft Energy Conservation (Compliance Enforcement) Rules, 2025, marking a significant shift from policy-setting to active enforcement under the Energy Conservation Act, 2001. For the first time, the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) will have explicit powers to detect, verify, and assess violations, and represent cases before adjudicating officers under State Electricity Regulatory Commissions. In an exclusive interaction with Energetica India, Rishi Agrawal, Co-Founder and CEO of TeamLease RegTech, shared his detailed insights on the implications of the draft rules, their impact on energy-intensive sectors, and the compliance frameworks companies must adopt to stay ahead of stricter enforcement.

Que: How will the draft Energy Conservation (Compliance Enforcement) Rules, 2025, change the compliance landscape for energy-intensive sectors?

Ans: The draft Energy Conservation (Compliance Enforcement) Rules, 2025, will significantly transform the compliance landscape for energy-intensive sectors, shifting from a framework reliant on self-reporting and voluntary adherence under the Energy Conservation Act. Previously, sectors such as cement, steel, automotive, and heavy manufacturing were expected to meet rigorous energy performance standards, but weak enforcement mechanisms led to inconsistent compliance. The new rules empower the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) to not only prescribe norms but also actively detect, verify, and assess non-compliance, and represent cases before adjudicating officers under State Electricity Regulatory Commissions.

These rules extend to a wide range of entities, including manufacturers, importers of energy-intensive appliances and equipment, and designated consumers such as industrial establishments. For example, automotive manufacturers will face stricter scrutiny of energy use in production processes and vehicle components. This broadened compliance net may make bypassing obligations more challenging. The BEE’s dual role as enforcer and case presenter reduces regulatory fragmentation, providing a clear, predictable legal and institutional framework for verifying energy consumption standards, ensuring adherence to performance benchmarks, and enabling inspections, testing, and penal provisions for non-compliance, such as financial penalties or operational restrictions.

For companies, this means stricter oversight and an increased risk of penalties for lapses, necessitating a proactive approach to compliance. It will push organisations to integrate energy efficiency into their operational and strategic priorities rather than treating it as a box-ticking exercise. In the long run, the rules will institutionalise energy conservation as a core compliance and sustainability imperative.


Que: What frameworks should companies put in place to ensure real-time monitoring, accurate reporting, and corrective action?

Ans: To align with the draft rules, companies, especially those in energy-intensive industries, must build compliance frameworks that go beyond reactive reporting and focus on continuous oversight. The first step is to establish real-time monitoring systems using IoT-enabled sensors and energy management software to track consumption patterns at the unit and equipment level. These tools may provide immediate visibility into deviations from prescribed efficiency norms, enabling early intervention.

Equally important is creating a digitised reporting ecosystem that consolidates data across plants, locations, and subsidiaries. Automated dashboards that integrate energy performance with compliance requirements may help generate regulatory reports while reducing paper-based and manual errors. Internal compliance calendars, self-audits, and structured data trails should be embedded within the system to withstand regulatory scrutiny.

From a governance perspective, companies should designate dedicated compliance officers or committees responsible for energy efficiency. Escalation protocols for non-compliance, corrective mechanisms, and oversight from the top should be formalised to ensure accountability at the highest levels. Training employees to understand reporting requirements and energy standards is equally important.

The framework should rest on three pillars: technology for monitoring, governance for accountability, and continuous training for compliance culture. These integrated vectors will help businesses stay aligned with both regulatory expectations and sustainability goals.


Que: Can RegTech platforms help automate monitoring and reporting to reduce the risk of non-compliance?

Ans: RegTech platforms can significantly enhance compliance with the Draft Energy Conservation (Compliance Enforcement) Rules, 2025, by automating monitoring and reporting for energy-intensive sectors. Traditional manual record-keeping is prone to errors, delays, and incomplete submissions, increasing the risk of penalties under stricter enforcement. RegTech solutions provide real-time tracking, standardised data management, and centralised repositories, ensuring accurate and auditable records for Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) inspections.

These platforms may integrate with operational systems, capturing data from IoT sensors, meters, and equipment to monitor energy consumption against Perform, Achieve, and Trade (PAT), Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC), and Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency (CAFE) standards. Automated dashboards map performance to regulatory thresholds, generating alerts for deviations to enable pre-emptive corrective actions. This reduces the likelihood of non-compliance, which could incur penalties up to INR 10 lakh or operational restrictions. By streamlining reporting and maintaining time-stamped, authenticated data, RegTech platforms can facilitate seamless compliance with the Energy Conservation Act, 2001 and support external audits. Adopting these technologies empowers companies to align with India’s sustainability goals while minimising regulatory risks.


Que: Will stricter enforcement accelerate India’s progress toward energy efficiency and climate commitments?

Ans: India’s energy conservation regime has so far leaned on voluntary disclosures, resulting in patchy compliance and modest outcomes. By granting enforcement powers to the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), the draft framework introduces accountability and deterrence, embedding greater discipline in the system.

For energy-intensive industries, regulatory clarity will make energy efficiency a strategic necessity rather than a choice. Integrating conservation into business processes will not only shape operational costs but also influence competitiveness and stakeholder trust. At the same time, mandatory verification will generate more reliable datasets on industrial energy use, enabling policymakers to design sharper and sector-specific interventions.
On the global stage, India’s transition from voluntary to enforceable compliance strengthens its standing in meeting the Paris Agreement goals and advancing toward net-zero by 2070. As these mechanisms mature, they will complement renewable energy targets, lowering emissions intensity and reducing systemic inefficiencies.

Ultimately, these rules shift the paradigm toward enforced efficiency, encouraging industries to internalise sustainability and positioning India on a more credible and sustained path toward its climate commitments.


Please share! Email Buffer Digg Facebook Google LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Twitter
If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content,
please contact: contact@energetica-india.net.
 
 
Next events
 
 
Last interviews
 
Follow us