Page 38

energetica-india-55

SOLAR POWER TECHNOLOGY WISE AVERAGE NET EXPORTED SOLAR POWER(KWH/MW) AND CUF(%) FOR PHASE-I, BATCH-I & BATCH-II BATCH I PHASE I Sr.No Month Avg CUF % Average net exported solar power(Kwh/MW) For Year 2014 Crystalline Technology Thin Film Technology Crystalline Technology Thin Film Technology 1 16.95 14.62 127865.0 110302.0 2 19.19 16.59 131038.0 114035.0 3 21.72 18.7 164415.0 141144.0 4 21.67 18.78 158121.0 137383.0 5 21.77 18.15 162891.0 137102.0 6 21.51 17.67 154686.0 129269.0 7 18.13 14.79 139026.0 111735.0 8 19.08 15.2 143172.0 115038.0 9 18.71 16.43 136356.0 123972.0 10 18.28 16.06 138763.0 121185.0 11 18.64 14.47 135383.0 105755.0 12 16.76 13.98 126150.0 105655.0 Average 19.36 16.28 143155.0 121047.0 Remark: a) Overall in Phase I, Average power generation per MW with crystalline technology is higher than thin film. TECHNOLOGY WISE AVERAGE NET EXPORTED SOLAR POWER(KWH/MW) AND CUF(%) FOR PHASE-I, BATCH-I & BATCH-II BATCH II PHASE I Sr.No Month Avg CUF % Average net exported solar power(Kwh/MW) For Year 2014 Crystalline Technology Thin Film Technology Crystalline Technology Thin Film Technology 1 17.55 18.95 131583.0 142758.0 2 21.56 21.41 145827.0 146255.0 3 23.51 23.23 176018.0 174177.0 4 24.54 24.49 177696.0 178228.0 5 23.38 23.54 175054.0 175930.0 6 23.06 23.61 171400.0 175054.0 7 20.49 20.75 153674.0 155686.0 8 21.36 21.26 159495.0 160182.0 9 22.29 22.37 162353.0 161630.0 10 22.00 21.41 164937.0 160808.0 11 21.25 20.63 153956.0 149055.0 12 20.02 18.99 150064.0 142718.0 Average 21.75 21.72 160171.0 160206.0 Remark: a) Average power generation per MW with both technologies is nearly same because maximum projects are in Rajasthan b) In month of January, power generation per MW with thin film is higher than crystalline technology. 38 energetica INDIA · JAN | FEB16


energetica-india-55
To see the actual publication please follow the link above