Page 37

energetica-india-55

MONTH WISE AVERAGE NET EXPORTED SOLAR POWER (KWH/MW) AND CUF (%) FOR PHASE-I Sr.No Month (Jan 2014- Dec 2014) Average Net Exported Solar Power, kWh/MW Phase-I, Batch-I CUF (%) Phase-I, Batch-I SOLAR POWER Average Net Exported Solar Power, kWh/MW Phase-I, Batch-II CUF (%) Phase-I, Batch-II 1 January 87095 11.71 133579 17.95 2 February 97007 14.44 138929 20.67 3 March 122674 16.49 167663 22.54 4 April 125562 17.44 170424 23.67 5 May 158218 21.27 168351 22.63 6 June 117373 16.30 163306 22.68 7 July 95749 12.87 148093 19.90 8 August 103912 13.97 152380 20.48 9 September 113361 15.74 154815 21.50 10 October 108104 14.53 154058 20.71 11 November 88797 12.33 143274 19.90 12 December 86048 11.57 137534 18.49 Average 108658 14.89 152700 20.92 Highest CUF 21.27 Lowest CUF 11.57 April Highest CUF 23.67 January Lowest CUF 17.95 Remark: a) It has been observed that solar power generation under Batch-I have lot of variation from CUF- 11.57 % to 21.27 % and maximum CUF is during month of May 2014. Average CUF is 14.89 % and Average Solar power generation is 108658 KWh/MW. This variation is due to the fact that projects are installed in thirteen States ( State wise analysis is also done and given below) b) Under Batch-II, there is no such variation of CUF. Minimum CUF is 17.95 % in the month of January. Average CUF is 20.92 % and Average Solar power generation is 152700 KWh/MW. Under Batch II, maximum solar power projects have been installed in the state of Rajasthan and show CUF of more than 20 %. STATE WISE AVERAGE NET EXPORTED SOLAR POWER(KWH/MW) AND CUF(%) FOR PHASE-I, BATCH-I& BATCH-II PHASE-I, BATCH-I Sr.No State Average Net Exported Solar Power, kWh/MW (period Jan 2014- Dec 2014) Average CUF (%) (period Jan 2014- Dec 2014) Crystalline Technology Thin Film Technology Crystalline Technology Thin Film Technology Higher CUF bet Thin Film & Crystalline 1 Andhra Pradesh 129903.0 144233.0 17.81 19.78 Thin Film 2 Chhattisgarh 137320.0 18.99 3 Haryana 101848.0 106745.0 13.99 14.63 Thin Film 4 Jharkhand 110982.0 114033.0 15.22 15.64 Thin Film 5 Karnataka 127914.0 17.59 6 M.P. 133832.0 109886.0 18.36 15.67 Crystalline 7 Maharashtra 129286.0 17.73 8 Oisha 100310.0 130779.0 13.77 17.94 Thin Film 9 Punjab 121610.0 116941.0 16.67 16.01 Crystalline 10 Rajasthan 152198.0 129752.0 20.85 17.78 Crystalline 11 Tamilnadu 122968.0 124139.0 16.87 17.01 Thin Film 12 U.P. 127731.0 89512.0 17.49 12.27 Crystalline 13 Uttarakhand 114400.0 113906.0 15.67 15.61 Crystalline Average 123869.0 117992.6 17.00 16.23 Remark: a) Both technologies have been used in Batch I. b) In MP, Rajasthan and UP, CUF of Crystalline Technology is more than thin film but in A.P., Odisha CUF of thin film is more than Crystalline Technology. c) Overall CUF of Crystalline Technology is more than thin film technology. d) Average power generation per MW of all above states with Crystalline Technology is more in comparison to thin film technology. e) Average % CUF for the stated period of a project with crystalline technology comes to 17.00 f) Average % CUF for the stated period of a project with thin film technology comes to 16.23 g) CUF more than 20 % is in the state of Rajasthan. STATE WISE AVERAGE NET EXPORTED SOLAR POWER(KWH/MW) AND CUF(%) FOR PHASE-I, BATCH-I& BATCH-II PHASE-I, BATCH-II Sr.No State Average Net Exported Solar Power, kWh/MW (period jan 2014- Dec 2014) Average CUF (%) (period jan 2014- Dec 2014) Crystalline Technology Thin Film Technology Crystalline Technology Thin Film Technology 1 Rajasthan 152958.0 158360.0 20.96 21.7 2 Maharashtra 111052.0 15.25 3 A.P. 155414.0 21.31 Average 152958.0 141608.0 20.96 19.42 Remark: a) Thin film is producing more power per MW in the state of Rajasthan. No other comparison can be made because projects with same technology are not available in other states. b) In Batch II, Average CUF is 20 % because maximum solar power projects have been installed in the state of Rajasthan 37 energetica INDIA · JAN | FEB16


energetica-india-55
To see the actual publication please follow the link above